Back to blog

System Design Interview: From Zero to Hero

Learn how to approach complex system design problems and communicate your architecture decisions effectively.

Jakub MertaDec 5, 202512 min readSystem Design
#system-design#interviews#architecture#communication

Summary

A structured approach to system design interviews that emphasizes tradeoffs, clarity, and pragmatic constraints.

Key takeaways

  • Start with requirements and constraints before drawing boxes.
  • Call out tradeoffs explicitly and tie them to user impact.
  • Use progressive refinement instead of jumping to final architecture.
  • Communicate assumptions and failure modes early.

System Design Interview: From Zero to Hero

Great system design answers balance clarity with practicality. You are evaluated on trade-offs, not on drawing every box.

A reusable five-step flow

  1. Clarify scope and traffic. Write down rough QPS, data size, latency targets.
  2. Define the single source of truth. Identify hot paths vs. batch paths.
  3. Partition and replicate. Choose a primary key, then consider secondary indexes or search.
  4. Plan for failure first. Rate limit, backpressure, and graceful degradation.
  5. Ship a simple MVP, then add optimizations like caches and queues.

Example prompt: URL shortener (2025 edition)

Rendering diagram...

Modern takes include:

  • Prefer UUIDv7 over base62 counters to avoid hot shards while keeping time ordering.
  • Keep read latency low with Redis cache + stale-while-revalidate (60–120s is plenty).
  • Store click analytics as immutable events; aggregate with stream processors later.

Communicating trade-offs

State the risks you are accepting (e.g., eventual consistency after failover) and what you would monitor. Interviewers want a resilient plan, not a perfect diagram.