Interview kitsBlog

Your dream job? Lets Git IT.
Interactive technical interview preparation platform designed for modern developers.

XGitHub

Platform

  • Categories

Resources

  • Blog
  • About the app
  • FAQ
  • Feedback

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 LetsGit.IT. All rights reserved.

LetsGit.IT/Categories/Databases
Databaseshard

Soft delete vs hard delete — what’s the trade-off?

Tags
#soft-delete#data-retention#auditing
Back to categoryPractice quiz

Answer

Soft delete marks a row as deleted (e.g., `deleted_at`) so you can restore/audit, but it complicates queries and indexes (you must filter out deleted rows). Hard delete removes data and simplifies queries, but you lose history unless you archive elsewhere.

Advanced answer

Deep dive

Expanding on the short answer — what usually matters in practice:

  • Context (tags): soft-delete, data-retention, auditing
  • Data model and access patterns: dominant queries (read/write ratio, sorting, pagination).
  • Indexes: when they help vs hurt (write amplification, memory).
  • Consistency & transactions: what’s guaranteed and what can bite you.
  • Explain the "why", not just the "what" (intuition + consequences).
  • Trade-offs: what you gain/lose (time, memory, complexity, risk).
  • Edge cases: empty inputs, large inputs, invalid inputs, concurrency.

Examples

A tiny example (query shape):

-- Example: index + query shape
SELECT *
FROM users
WHERE email = '[email protected]'
LIMIT 1;

Common pitfalls

  • Too generic: no concrete trade-offs or examples.
  • Mixing average-case and worst-case (e.g., complexity).
  • Ignoring constraints: memory, concurrency, network/disk costs.

Interview follow-ups

  • When would you choose an alternative and why?
  • What production issues show up and how do you diagnose them?
  • How would you test edge cases?